Title |
Hormesis Effects Induced by Cadmium on Growth and Photosynthetic Performance in a Hyperaccumulator, Lonicera japonica Thunb.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00344-014-9433-1 |
Authors |
Lian Jia, Zhouli Liu, Wei Chen, Yin Ye, Shuai Yu, Xingyuan He |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 21% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,190,980
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#27
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,450
of 228,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them