| Title |
Clinical Portrait of the SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic in European Patients with Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Pinato, Alberto Zambelli, Juan Aguilar-Company, Mark Bower, Christopher C.T. Sng, Ramon Salazar, Alexia Bertuzzi, Joan Brunet, Ricard Mesia, Elia Seguí, Federica Biello, Daniele Generali, Salvatore Grisanti, Gianpiero Rizzo, Michela Libertini, Antonio Maconi, Nadia Harbeck, Bruno Vincenzi, Rossella Bertulli, Diego Ottaviani, Anna Carbó, Riccardo Bruna, Sarah Benafif, Andrea Marrari, Rachel Wuerstlein, M. Carmen Carmona-Garcia, Neha Chopra, Carlo Tondini, Oriol Mirallas, Valeria Tovazzi, Marta Betti, Salvatore Provenzano, Vittoria Fotia, Claudia Andrea Cruz, Alessia Dalla Pria, Francesca D'Avanzo, Joanne S. Evans, Nadia Saoudi-Gonzalez, Eudald Felip, Myria Galazi, Isabel Garcia-Fructuoso, Alvin J.X. Lee, Thomas Newsom-Davis, Andrea Patriarca, David García-Illescas, Roxana Reyes, Palma Dileo, Rachel Sharkey, Yien Ning Sophia Wong, Daniela Ferrante, Javier Marco-Hernández, Anna Sureda, Clara Maluquer, Isabel Ruiz-Camps, Gianluca Gaidano, Lorenza Rimassa, Lorenzo Chiudinelli, Macarena Izuzquiza, Alba Cabirta, Michela Franchi, Armando Santoro, Aleix Prat, Josep Tabernero, Alessandra Gennari, Gian Carlo Avanzi, Mattia Bellan, Luigi Mario Castello, Maria Martinez, Meritxell Mollà, Mario Pirisi, Lorenza Scotti, Judith Swallow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,067 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 544 | 26% |
| United States | 41 | 2% |
| Spain | 38 | 2% |
| Brazil | 24 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 21 | 1% |
| Belgium | 19 | <1% |
| Canada | 19 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 18 | <1% |
| Other | 104 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1217 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1973 | 95% |
| Scientists | 42 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 635. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#35,367
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#9
of 4,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,340
of 434,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.