You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Intersectional Effects of Diverse Elections on Validated Turnout in the 2018 Midterm Elections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Political Research Quarterly, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1065912920945781 |
| Authors |
Vladimir E. Medenica, Matthew Fowler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 63% |
| Georgia | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 59% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,130,897
of 24,972,914 outputs
Outputs from Political Research Quarterly
#556
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,321
of 405,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Research Quarterly
#20
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,972,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.