| Title |
“Reconsidering the 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic in the Age of COVID-19”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537781420000377 |
| Authors |
Christopher McKnight Nichols, Nancy Bristow, E. Thomas Ewing, Joseph M. Gabriel, Benjamin C. Montoya, Elizabeth Outka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 46% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#769,977
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era
#4
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,982
of 428,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.