↓ Skip to main content

When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning?

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning?
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10648-012-9203-1
Authors

Katherine A. Rawson, John Dunlosky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 32%
Social Sciences 30 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Computer Science 8 5%
Linguistics 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 41 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,521,559
of 23,940,110 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#198
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,276
of 165,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.