↓ Skip to main content

Can realistic interaction be useful for nuclear mean-field approaches?

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal A, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Can realistic interaction be useful for nuclear mean-field approaches?
Published in
The European Physical Journal A, July 2016
DOI 10.1140/epja/i2016-16185-y
Authors

H. Nakada, K. Sugiura, T. Inakura, J. Margueron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 10%
France 1 10%
Unknown 8 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 70%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,237,853
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal A
#1,095
of 1,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,439
of 358,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal A
#35
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.