| Title |
Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1 |
| Authors |
Anantha M. Prasad, Louis R. Iverson, Andy Liaw |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,868 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 2% |
| Canada | 14 | <1% |
| Germany | 10 | <1% |
| Spain | 8 | <1% |
| Brazil | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 39 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1721 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 433 | 23% |
| Researcher | 405 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 256 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 105 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 105 | 6% |
| Other | 248 | 13% |
| Unknown | 316 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 500 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 459 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 145 | 8% |
| Engineering | 101 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 79 | 4% |
| Other | 181 | 10% |
| Unknown | 403 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#391
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,198
of 88,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.