You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
連続略取誘拐事件の犯罪者プロファイリング手法の一考察―被害者の年齢別にみた犯行形態と犯人属性について―
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Criminal Psychology, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.20754/jjcp.45.1_35 |
Authors |
横田 賀英子, 藤田 悟郎, 渡邉 和美, 伊原 直子, 吉本 かおり |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 43% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,519,340
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Criminal Psychology
#4
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,638
of 344,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Criminal Psychology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them