↓ Skip to main content

日本生まれの肝 ・ 胆 ・ 消化機能改善剤 ウルソデオキシコール酸開発の歩み

Overview of attention for article published in Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本生まれの肝 ・ 胆 ・ 消化機能改善剤 ウルソデオキシコール酸開発の歩み
Published in
Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy, August 2020
DOI 10.34531/jjhp.55.1_13
Authors

仲安 義行

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy
#16
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,974
of 426,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Yakushigaku zasshi The Journal of Japanese history of pharmacy
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.