↓ Skip to main content

Doing What Feels Good (and Avoiding What Feels Bad)—a Growing Recognition of the Influence of Affect on Exercise Behavior: a Comment on Williams et al.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Doing What Feels Good (and Avoiding What Feels Bad)—a Growing Recognition of the Influence of Affect on Exercise Behavior: a Comment on Williams et al.
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9374-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J. Petruzzello

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Sports and Recreations 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,463,662
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1,257
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,575
of 164,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.