| Title |
Asian doctors in the NHS: service and betrayal.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2007
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aneez Esmail |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 40% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#516,100
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#209
of 4,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#759
of 84,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.