↓ Skip to main content

Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1
Published in
Synthese, May 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:synt.0000029950.50517.59
Authors

Christian List, Philip Pettit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Australia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 27%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 33 37%
Social Sciences 19 21%
Computer Science 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#2,544
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,682
of 62,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.