↓ Skip to main content

Generalization of visual regularities in newly hatched chicks (Gallus gallus)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Generalization of visual regularities in newly hatched chicks (Gallus gallus)
Published in
Animal Cognition, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10071-016-1005-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Santolin, Orsola Rosa-Salva, Lucia Regolin, Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract

Evidence of learning and generalization of visual regularities in a newborn organism is provided in the present research. Domestic chicks have been trained to discriminate visual triplets of simultaneously presented shapes, implementing AAB versus ABA (Experiment 1), AAB versus ABB and AAB versus BAA (Experiment 2). Chicks distinguished pattern-following and pattern-violating novel test triplets in all comparisons, showing no preference for repetition-based patterns. The animals generalized to novel instances even when the patterns compared were not discriminable by the presence or absence of reduplicated elements or by symmetry (e.g., AAB vs. ABB). These findings represent the first evidence of learning and generalization of regularities at the onset of life in an animal model, revealing intriguing differences with respect to human newborns and infants. Extensive prior experience seems to be unnecessary to drive the process, suggesting that chicks are predisposed to detect patterns characterizing the visual world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 34%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,629,520
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#627
of 1,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,150
of 345,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.