Title |
Generalization of visual regularities in newly hatched chicks (Gallus gallus)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Cognition, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10071-016-1005-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chiara Santolin, Orsola Rosa-Salva, Lucia Regolin, Giorgio Vallortigara |
Abstract |
Evidence of learning and generalization of visual regularities in a newborn organism is provided in the present research. Domestic chicks have been trained to discriminate visual triplets of simultaneously presented shapes, implementing AAB versus ABA (Experiment 1), AAB versus ABB and AAB versus BAA (Experiment 2). Chicks distinguished pattern-following and pattern-violating novel test triplets in all comparisons, showing no preference for repetition-based patterns. The animals generalized to novel instances even when the patterns compared were not discriminable by the presence or absence of reduplicated elements or by symmetry (e.g., AAB vs. ABB). These findings represent the first evidence of learning and generalization of regularities at the onset of life in an animal model, revealing intriguing differences with respect to human newborns and infants. Extensive prior experience seems to be unnecessary to drive the process, suggesting that chicks are predisposed to detect patterns characterizing the visual world. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Israel | 1 | 3% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 10 | 34% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |