↓ Skip to main content

Stroboscopic visual training improves information encoding in short-term memory

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Stroboscopic visual training improves information encoding in short-term memory
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13414-012-0344-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Gregory Appelbaum, Matthew S. Cain, Julia E. Schroeder, Elise F. Darling, Stephen R. Mitroff

Abstract

The visual system has developed to transform an undifferentiated and continuous flow of information into discrete and manageable representations, and this ability rests primarily on the uninterrupted nature of the input. Here we explore the impact of altering how visual information is accumulated over time by assessing how intermittent vision influences memory retention. Previous work has shown that intermittent, or stroboscopic, visual training (i.e., practicing while only experiencing snapshots of vision) can enhance visual-motor control and visual cognition, yet many questions remain unanswered about the mechanisms that are altered. In the present study, we used a partial-report memory paradigm to assess the possible changes in visual memory following training under stroboscopic conditions. In Experiment 1, the memory task was completed before and immediately after a training phase, wherein participants engaged in physical activities (e.g., playing catch) while wearing either specialized stroboscopic eyewear or transparent control eyewear. In Experiment 2, an additional group of participants underwent the same stroboscopic protocol but were delayed 24 h between training and assessment, so as to measure retention. In comparison to the control group, both stroboscopic groups (immediate and delayed retest) revealed enhanced retention of information in short-term memory, leading to better recall at longer stimulus-to-cue delays (640-2,560 ms). These results demonstrate that training under stroboscopic conditions has the capacity to enhance some aspects of visual memory, that these faculties generalize beyond the specific tasks that were trained, and that trained improvements can be maintained for at least a day.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 17%
Student > Master 26 16%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Lecturer 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 41 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 18%
Sports and Recreations 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 43 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,095,568
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#101
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,581
of 178,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.