| Title |
Performance of Guideline Recommendations for Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michel Zeitouni, Michael G. Nanna, Jie-Lena Sun, Karen Chiswell, Eric D. Peterson, Ann Marie Navar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| France | 5 | 14% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#649,933
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,663
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,325
of 428,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#56
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.