↓ Skip to main content

Post-GWAS Prioritization Through Data Integration Provides Novel Insights on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Statistics in Biosciences, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Post-GWAS Prioritization Through Data Integration Provides Novel Insights on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
Statistics in Biosciences, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12561-016-9151-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiongshi Lu, Chentian Jin, Jiehuan Sun, Russell Bowler, Katerina Kechris, Naftali Kaminski, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract

Rich collections of genomic and epigenomic annotations, availabilities of large population cohorts for genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and advancements in data integration techniques provide the unprecedented opportunity to accelerate discoveries in complex disease studies through integrative analyses. In this paper, we apply a variety of approaches to integrate GWAS summary statistics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with functional annotations to illustrate how data integration could help researchers understand complex human diseases. We show that incorporating functional annotations can better prioritize GWAS signals at both the global and the local levels. Signal prioritization on severe COPD GWAS reveals multiple potential risk loci that are linked with pulmonary functions. Enrichment analysis provides novel insights on the pathogenesis of COPD and hints the existence of genetic contributions to muscle dysfuncion and chronic lung inflammation, two symptoms that are often co-morbid with COPD. Our results suggest that rich signals for COPD genetics are still buried under the Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold. Many more biological findings are expected to emerge as more samples are recruited for COPD studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 5 23%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,427,420
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Statistics in Biosciences
#17
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,815
of 352,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics in Biosciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them