| Title |
Annual volume increment of the European forests—description and evaluation of the national methods used
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-016-0557-2 |
| Authors |
Stein Michael Tomter, Andrius Kuliešis, Thomas Gschwantner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,598,118
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#473
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,610
of 368,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.