You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and characterisation of diagnostic error among 7-day all-cause hospital medicine readmissions: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010896 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie E Raffel, Molly A Kantor, Peter Barish, Armond Esmaili, Hana Lim, Feifei Xue, Sumant R Ranji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 41% |
| Scientists | 17 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 45% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,063,565
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#429
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,567
of 426,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.