You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
設置管理許可制度を活用した都市公園における公共性と収益性の担保のあり方
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.11361/cpijkansai.18.0_13 |
| Authors |
加藤 翔太, 佐久間 康富 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,347,775
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch
#2
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,226
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them