↓ Skip to main content

Detection of P. aeruginosa harboring blaCTX-M-2, blaGES-1 and blaGES-5,blaIMP-1 and blaSPM-1causing infections in Brazilian tertiary-care hospital

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Detection of P. aeruginosa harboring blaCTX-M-2, blaGES-1 and blaGES-5,blaIMP-1 and blaSPM-1causing infections in Brazilian tertiary-care hospital
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milena Polotto, Tiago Casella, Maria Gabriela de Lucca Oliveira, Fernando G Rúbio, Mauricio L Nogueira, Margarete TG de Almeida, Mara CL Nogueira

Abstract

Nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa presenting resistance to beta-lactam drugs are one of the most challenging targets for antimicrobial therapy, leading to substantial increase in mortality rates in hospitals worldwide. In this context, P. aeruginosa harboring acquired mechanisms of resistance, such as production of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBLs) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) have the highest clinical impact. Hence, this study was designed to investigate the presence of genes codifying for MBLs and ESBLs among carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa isolated in a Brazilian 720-bed teaching tertiary care hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,557
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,183
of 164,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#58
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.