↓ Skip to main content

Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1623 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2220 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch
Published in
Nature, August 2004
DOI 10.1038/nature02808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Edwards, Anthony J. Richardson

Abstract

Phenology, the study of annually recurring life cycle events such as the timing of migrations and flowering, can provide particularly sensitive indicators of climate change. Changes in phenology may be important to ecosystem function because the level of response to climate change may vary across functional groups and multiple trophic levels. The decoupling of phenological relationships will have important ramifications for trophic interactions, altering food-web structures and leading to eventual ecosystem-level changes. Temperate marine environments may be particularly vulnerable to these changes because the recruitment success of higher trophic levels is highly dependent on synchronization with pulsed planktonic production. Using long-term data of 66 plankton taxa during the period from 1958 to 2002, we investigated whether climate warming signals are emergent across all trophic levels and functional groups within an ecological community. Here we show that not only is the marine pelagic community responding to climate changes, but also that the level of response differs throughout the community and the seasonal cycle, leading to a mismatch between trophic levels and functional groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 28 1%
United Kingdom 20 <1%
Canada 9 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Australia 8 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
Argentina 7 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
Chile 6 <1%
Other 65 3%
Unknown 2055 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 472 21%
Researcher 462 21%
Student > Master 344 15%
Student > Bachelor 258 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 88 4%
Other 346 16%
Unknown 250 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1039 47%
Environmental Science 516 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 207 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 1%
Engineering 20 <1%
Other 81 4%
Unknown 328 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#364,428
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#18,615
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288
of 63,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#6
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.