| Title |
The case for an essential medicines list for Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.160134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gina Eom, Paul Grootendorst, Jacalyn Duffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 14 | 74% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 37% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#540,537
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#905
of 9,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,674
of 373,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#14
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.