You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fragmentation Without Cleavages? Endogenous Fractionalization in the Brazilian Party System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Comparative Politics, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.5129/001041521x15941508069585 |
| Authors |
Cesar Zucco, Timothy J. Power |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Scientists | 15 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 58% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#340,962
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Politics
#6
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,121
of 457,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Politics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them