↓ Skip to main content

Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
51 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0574-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davy Vancampfort, Simon Rosenbaum, Felipe Schuch, Philip B. Ward, Justin Richards, James Mugisha, Michel Probst, Brendon Stubbs

Abstract

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) among people with severe mental illness (SMI) (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder) is a critical clinical risk factor given its relationship to cardiovascular disease and premature mortality. This study aimed to: (1) investigate the mean CRF in people with SMI versus healthy controls; (2) explore moderators of CRF; and (3) investigate whether CRF improved with exercise interventions and establish if fitness improves more than body mass index following exercise interventions. Major electronic databases were searched systematically. A meta-analysis calculating Hedges' g statistic was undertaken. Across 23 eligible studies, pooled mean CRF was 28.7 mL/kg/min [95 % confidence interval (CI) 27.3 to 30.0 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001, n = 980]. People with SMI had significantly lower CRF compared with controls (n = 310) (Hedges' g = -1.01, 95 % CI -1.18 to -0.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between diagnostic subgroups. In a multivariate regression, first-episode (β = 6.6, 95 % CI 0.6-12.6) and inpatient (β = 5.3, 95 % CI 1.6-9.0) status were significant predictors of higher CRF. Exercise improved CRF (Hedges' g = 0.33, 95 % CI = 0.21-0.45, p = 0.001), but did not reduce body mass index. Higher CRF improvements were observed following interventions at high intensity, with higher frequency (at least three times per week) and supervised by qualified personnel (i.e., physiotherapists and exercise physiologists). The multidisciplinary treatment of people with SMI should include a focus on improving fitness to reduce all-cause mortality. Qualified healthcare professionals supporting people with SMI in maintaining an active lifestyle should be included as part of multidisciplinary teams in mental health treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Unknown 374 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 94 25%
Student > Master 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 11%
Researcher 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 96 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 17%
Psychology 34 9%
Sports and Recreations 26 7%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 116 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#633,696
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#591
of 2,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,441
of 369,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#8
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.