↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing and annotating the genome using RNA-seq data

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Characterizing and annotating the genome using RNA-seq data
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11427-015-0349-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geng Chen, Tieliu Shi, Leming Shi

Abstract

Bioinformatics methods for various RNA-seq data analyses are in fast evolution with the improvement of sequencing technologies. However, many challenges still exist in how to efficiently process the RNA-seq data to obtain accurate and comprehensive results. Here we reviewed the strategies for improving diverse transcriptomic studies and the annotation of genetic variants based on RNA-seq data. Mapping RNA-seq reads to the genome and transcriptome represent two distinct methods for quantifying the expression of genes/transcripts. Besides the known genes annotated in current databases, many novel genes/transcripts (especially those long noncoding RNAs) still can be identified on the reference genome using RNA-seq. Moreover, owing to the incompleteness of current reference genomes, some novel genes are missing from them. Genome- guided and de novo transcriptome reconstruction are two effective and complementary strategies for identifying those novel genes/transcripts on or beyond the reference genome. In addition, integrating the genes of distinct databases to conduct transcriptomics and genetics studies can improve the results of corresponding analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 23%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,939,208
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#133
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,973
of 352,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.