↓ Skip to main content

Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9673-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David T. Wong, Jaisy J. Yang, Narasimhan Jagannathan

Abstract

This article is a review of the efficacy and safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme™ as a stand-alone supraglottic airway during general anesthesia and as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Relevant articles were obtained using MEDLINE (1948-July 2011) and EMBASE (1980-July 2011). Only original studies with adult human patients and published in English were selected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 59%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,536,679
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,982
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,605
of 254,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.