↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Triple P parenting intervention on child health outcomes for childhood asthma and eczema: Randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Triple P parenting intervention on child health outcomes for childhood asthma and eczema: Randomised controlled trial
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina Morawska, Amy E. Mitchell, Scott Burgess, Jennifer Fraser

Abstract

Childhood chronic health conditions have considerable impact on children. We aimed to test the efficacy of a brief, group-based parenting intervention for improving illness-related child behaviour problems, parents' self-efficacy, quality of life, parents' competence with treatment, and symptom severity. A 2 (intervention vs. care as usual) by 3 (baseline, post-intervention, 6-month follow-up) design was used, with random group assignment. Participants were 107 parents of 2- to 10-year-old children with asthma and/or eczema. Parents completed self-report questionnaires, symptom diaries, and home observations were completed. The intervention comprised two 2-h group discussions based on Triple P. Parents in the intervention group reported (i) fewer eczema-related, but not asthma-related, child behaviour problems; (ii) improved self-efficacy for managing eczema, but not asthma; (iii) better quality of life for parent and family, but not child; (iv) no change in parental treatment competence; (v) reduced symptom severity, particularly for children prescribed corticosteroid-based treatments. Results demonstrate the potential for brief parenting interventions to improve childhood chronic illness management, child health outcomes, and family wellbeing. Effects were stronger for eczema-specific outcomes compared to asthma-specific outcomes. Effects on symptom severity are very promising, and further research examining effects on objective disease severity and treatment adherence is warranted. ACTRN12611000558921.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,568,405
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#2,282
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,409
of 355,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.