↓ Skip to main content

Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Jamrozik, Marguerite McQuire, Eileen R. Cardillo, Anjan Chatterjee

Abstract

Embodied cognition accounts posit that concepts are grounded in our sensory and motor systems. An important challenge for these accounts is explaining how abstract concepts, which do not directly call upon sensory or motor information, can be informed by experience. We propose that metaphor is one important vehicle guiding the development and use of abstract concepts. Metaphors allow us to draw on concrete, familiar domains to acquire and reason about abstract concepts. Additionally, repeated metaphoric use drawing on particular aspects of concrete experience can result in the development of new abstract representations. These abstractions, which are derived from embodied experience but lack much of the sensorimotor information associated with it, can then be flexibly applied to understand new situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 236 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 53 22%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 26%
Linguistics 32 13%
Neuroscience 21 9%
Social Sciences 17 7%
Arts and Humanities 17 7%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 54 22%