↓ Skip to main content

To CG or to HDG: A Comparative Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scientific Computing, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 871)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
To CG or to HDG: A Comparative Study
Published in
Journal of Scientific Computing, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10915-011-9501-7
Authors

Robert M. Kirby, Spencer J. Sherwin, Bernardo Cockburn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Canada 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 76 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 34%
Researcher 13 16%
Professor 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 30%
Mathematics 23 28%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,667,264
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scientific Computing
#26
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,333
of 119,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scientific Computing
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.