You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/eb-2012-100608 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Bond, Toby Pavey, Karen Welch, Chris Cooper, Ruth Garside, Sarah Dean, Christopher J Hyde |
| Abstract |
To identify the psychological effects of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#744,039
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#93
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,754
of 179,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.