| Title |
Absence of a relationship between immunophenotypic and colony enumeration analysis of endothelial progenitor cells in clinical haematopoietic cell sources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-5-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga Tura, G Robin Barclay, Huw Roddie, John Davies, Marc L Turner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,484,899
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,238
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,495
of 67,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.