↓ Skip to main content

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to “native chicory inulin” and maintenance of normal defecation by increasing stool frequency pursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation …

Overview of attention for article published in EFSA Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to “native chicory inulin” and maintenance of normal defecation by increasing stool frequency pursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
Published in
EFSA Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3951
Authors

Nutrition and Allergies EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Chemistry 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 43 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,693,565
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from EFSA Journal
#641
of 4,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,688
of 364,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EFSA Journal
#18
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.