↓ Skip to main content

“A Hideous Torture on Himself”: Madness and Self-Mutilation in Victorian Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Humanities, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 414)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
“A Hideous Torture on Himself”: Madness and Self-Mutilation in Victorian Literature
Published in
Journal of Medical Humanities, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10912-011-9152-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Chaney

Abstract

This paper suggests that late nineteenth-century definitions of self-mutilation, a new category of psychiatric symptomatology, were heavily influenced by the use of self-injury as a rhetorical device in the novel, for the literary text held a high status in Victorian psychology. In exploring Dimmesdale's "self-mutilation" in The Scarlet Letter in conjunction with psychiatric case histories, the paper indicates a number of common techniques and themes in literary and psychiatric texts. As well as illuminating key elements of nineteenth-century conceptions of the self, and the relation of mind and body through ideas of madness, this exploration also serves to highlight the social commentary implicit in many Victorian medical texts. Late nineteenth-century England, like mid-century New England, required the individual to help himself and, simultaneously, others; personal charity and individual philanthropy were encouraged, while state intervention was often presented as dubious. In both novel and psychiatric text, self-mutilation is thus presented as the ultimate act of selfish preoccupation, particularly in cases on the "borderlands" of insanity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 14 30%
Social Sciences 8 17%
Psychology 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2017.
All research outputs
#934,684
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Humanities
#13
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,932
of 120,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Humanities
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.