| Title |
The Network of Knowledge approach: improving the science and society dialogue on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1127-5 |
| Authors |
Carsten Nesshöver, Marie Vandewalle, Heidi Wittmer, Estelle V. Balian, Esther Carmen, Ilse R. Geijzendorffer, Christoph Görg, Rob Jongman, Barbara Livoreil, Luis Santamaria, Stefan Schindler, Josef Settele, Isabel Sousa Pinto, Katalin Török, Jiska van Dijk, Allan D. Watt, Juliette C. Young, Klaus Peter Zulka, the KNEU Project Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 12% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,406,136
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#516
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,450
of 374,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#18
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.