You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized controlled trial of web-based multimodal therapy for children with acquired brain injury to improve gross motor capacity and performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0269215516651980 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmah Baque, Lee Barber, Leanne Sakzewski, Roslyn N Boyd |
| Abstract |
To compare efficacy of a web-based multimodal training programme, 'Move it to improve it' (Mitii(TM)), to usual care on gross motor capacity and performance for children with an acquired brain injury. Randomized waitlist controlled trial. Home environment. A total of 60 independently ambulant children (30 in each group), minimum 12 months post-acquired brain injury were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either 20 weeks of Mitii(TM) training (30 minutes/day, six days/week, total 60 hours) immediately, or waitlisted (usual care control group) for 20 weeks. A total of 58 children completed baseline assessments (32 males; age 11 years 11 months ± 2 years 6 months; Gross Motor Function Classification System equivalent I = 29, II = 29). The Mitii(TM) program comprised of gross motor, upper limb and visual perception/cognitive activities. The primary outcome was 30-second, repetition maximum functional strength tests for the lower limb (sit-to-stand, step-ups, half-kneel to stand). Secondary outcomes were the 6-minute walk test, High-level Mobility Assessment Tool, Timed Up and Go Test and habitual physical activity as captured by four-day accelerometry. Groups were equivalent at baseline on demographic and clinical measures. The Mitii(TM) group demonstrated significantly greater improvements on combined score of functional strength tests (mean difference 10.19 repetitions; 95% confidence interval, 3.26-17.11; p = 0.006) compared with the control group. There were no other between-group differences on secondary outcomes. Although the Mitii(TM) programme demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the functional strength tests of the lower limb, results did not exceed the minimum detectable change and cannot be considered clinically relevant for children with an acquired brain injury. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registration Number, ANZCTR12613000403730. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 284 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 106 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 10% |
| Psychology | 19 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 114 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,143
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rehabilitation
#1,496
of 1,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,090
of 342,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rehabilitation
#365
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.