↓ Skip to main content

PPIs and kidney disease: from AIN to CKD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
PPIs and kidney disease: from AIN to CKD
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40620-016-0309-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis G. Moledina, Mark A. Perazella

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed and available over-the-counter, and are taken by millions of patients around the world, often for many months to years. While PPIs have an excellent overall safety profile, concerns have been raised about adverse renal events, specifically their association with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). While only a small proportion of patients develop AIN from PPIs, these drugs are now a common cause of drug-induced AIN in the developed world due to their widespread and prolonged use. PPI-induced AIN is often subtle and without systemic allergic manifestations; subclinical, leading to gradually progressive kidney failure; delayed, median time from drug initiation to AIN diagnosis often exceeds 6 months; and often unsuspected prior to a biopsy. While the association between PPIs and AIN is well described, the population incidence of PPI-induced AIN and its contribution to the burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was unclear, until recently. First, two population-based studies described higher risk of AIN and acute kidney injury in patients prescribed PPIs. Second, evidence suggests that on intermediate to longer term follow-up, patients have a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate after an episode of PPI-induced AIN and patients prescribed PPIs have higher CKD risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Chemistry 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,648,551
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#340
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,597
of 304,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.