↓ Skip to main content

Shoes alter the spring-like function of the human foot during running

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
90 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shoes alter the spring-like function of the human foot during running
Published in
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, June 2016
DOI 10.1098/rsif.2016.0174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke A. Kelly, Glen A. Lichtwark, Dominic J. Farris, Andrew Cresswell

Abstract

The capacity to store and return energy in legs and feet that behave like springs is crucial to human running economy. Recent comparisons of shod and barefoot running have led to suggestions that modern running shoes may actually impede leg and foot-spring function by reducing the contributions from the leg and foot musculature. Here we examined the effect of running shoes on foot longitudinal arch (LA) motion and activation of the intrinsic foot muscles. Participants ran on a force-instrumented treadmill with and without running shoes. We recorded foot kinematics and muscle activation of the intrinsic foot muscles using intramuscular electromyography. In contrast to previous assertions, we observed an increase in both the peak (flexor digitorum brevis +60%) and total stance muscle activation (flexor digitorum brevis +70% and abductor hallucis +53%) of the intrinsic foot muscles when running with shoes. Increased intrinsic muscle activation corresponded with a reduction in LA compression (-25%). We confirm that running shoes do indeed influence the mechanical function of the foot. However, our findings suggest that these mechanical adjustments are likely to have occurred as a result of increased neuromuscular output, rather than impaired control as previously speculated. We propose a theoretical model for foot-shoe interaction to explain these novel findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 249 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 51 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 68 27%
Engineering 34 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 70 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#111,586
of 24,846,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#55
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,282
of 345,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,846,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.