Title |
Shoes alter the spring-like function of the human foot during running
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1098/rsif.2016.0174 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luke A. Kelly, Glen A. Lichtwark, Dominic J. Farris, Andrew Cresswell |
Abstract |
The capacity to store and return energy in legs and feet that behave like springs is crucial to human running economy. Recent comparisons of shod and barefoot running have led to suggestions that modern running shoes may actually impede leg and foot-spring function by reducing the contributions from the leg and foot musculature. Here we examined the effect of running shoes on foot longitudinal arch (LA) motion and activation of the intrinsic foot muscles. Participants ran on a force-instrumented treadmill with and without running shoes. We recorded foot kinematics and muscle activation of the intrinsic foot muscles using intramuscular electromyography. In contrast to previous assertions, we observed an increase in both the peak (flexor digitorum brevis +60%) and total stance muscle activation (flexor digitorum brevis +70% and abductor hallucis +53%) of the intrinsic foot muscles when running with shoes. Increased intrinsic muscle activation corresponded with a reduction in LA compression (-25%). We confirm that running shoes do indeed influence the mechanical function of the foot. However, our findings suggest that these mechanical adjustments are likely to have occurred as a result of increased neuromuscular output, rather than impaired control as previously speculated. We propose a theoretical model for foot-shoe interaction to explain these novel findings. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 11 | 12% |
Australia | 6 | 7% |
France | 4 | 4% |
Finland | 3 | 3% |
Italy | 3 | 3% |
Belgium | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 66% |
Scientists | 24 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 249 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
Researcher | 30 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 13% |
Unknown | 51 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 68 | 27% |
Engineering | 34 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Unknown | 70 | 28% |