↓ Skip to main content

The Neurobiology of "Food Addiction" and Its Implications for Obesity Treatment and Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Nutrition, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Neurobiology of "Food Addiction" and Its Implications for Obesity Treatment and Policy
Published in
Annual Review of Nutrition, June 2016
DOI 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-050909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Carter, Joshua Hendrikse, Natalia Lee, Murat Yücel, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia, Zane B. Andrews, Wayne Hall

Abstract

There is a growing view that certain foods, particularly those high in refined sugars and fats, are addictive and that some forms of obesity can usefully be treated as a food addiction. This perspective is supported by a growing body of neuroscience research demonstrating that the chronic consumption of energy-dense foods causes changes in the brain's reward pathway that are central to the development and maintenance of drug addiction. Obese and overweight individuals also display patterns of eating behavior that resemble the ways in which addicted individuals consume drugs. We critically review the evidence that some forms of obesity or overeating could be considered a food addiction and argue that the use of food addiction as a diagnostic category is premature. We also examine some of the potential positive and negative clinical, social, and public policy implications of describing obesity as a food addiction that require further investigation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Nutrition Volume 36 is July 17, 2016. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 310 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 69 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Neuroscience 32 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 82 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,227,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Nutrition
#72
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,511
of 353,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Nutrition
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.