You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Heritability and genome-wide analyses of problematic peer relationships during childhood and adolescence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00439-016-1695-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beate St Pourcain, C. M. A. Haworth, O. S. P. Davis, Kai Wang, Nicholas J. Timpson, David M. Evans, John P. Kemp, Angelica Ronald, Tom Price, Emma Meaburn, Susan M. Ring, Jean Golding, Hakon Hakonarson, R. Plomin, George Davey Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,333,181
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,818
of 2,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,047
of 352,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.