| Title |
Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Community Mental Health Settings: The Relative Importance of Key Domains of Implementation Activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-011-0357-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William C. Torrey, Gary R. Bond, Gregory J. McHugo, Karin Swain |
| Abstract |
Implementation research has examined practice prioritization, implementation leadership, workforce development, workflow re-engineering, and practice reinforcement, but not addressed their relative importance as implementation drivers. This study investigated domains of implementation activities and correlated them to implementation success during a large national evidence-based practice implementation project. Implementation success was correlated with active leadership strategically devoted to redesigning the flow of work and reinforcing implementation through measurement and feedback. Relative attention to workforce development was negatively correlated with implementation. Active leaders should focus on redesigning the flow of work to support the implementation and on reinforcing program improvements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,597,573
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#475
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,477
of 114,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.