↓ Skip to main content

Aid curse with Chinese characteristics? Chinese development flows and economic reforms

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aid curse with Chinese characteristics? Chinese development flows and economic reforms
Published in
Public Choice, August 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11127-020-00836-z
Authors

Samuel Brazys, Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 17 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,181,901
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#532
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,286
of 428,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.