↓ Skip to main content

Developing and Costing Local Strategies to Improve Maternal and Child Health: The Investment Case Framework

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing and Costing Local Strategies to Improve Maternal and Child Health: The Investment Case Framework
Published in
PLOS Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliana Jimenez Soto, Sophie La Vincente, Andrew Clark, Sonja Firth, Alison Morgan, Zoe Dettrick, Prarthna Dayal, Bernardino M. Aldaba, Beena Varghese, Laksono Trisnantoro, Yogendra Prasai, Anna Bauze, Deni Harbianto, Soewarta Kosen, Aleli Kraft, Faozi Kurniawan, Michelle D. Macalintal, Paul A. Mariano, Kim Nguyen, Marian Angelika K. Panganiban, Rajashree Panicker, Johanna M. Santiago, Sneha Singh, Jacobe J. Villareal, Yulia Widiati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Lecturer 23 17%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,398,866
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,949
of 5,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,094
of 184,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#28
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.