You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing and Costing Local Strategies to Improve Maternal and Child Health: The Investment Case Framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS Medicine, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001282 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eliana Jimenez Soto, Sophie La Vincente, Andrew Clark, Sonja Firth, Alison Morgan, Zoe Dettrick, Prarthna Dayal, Bernardino M. Aldaba, Beena Varghese, Laksono Trisnantoro, Yogendra Prasai, Anna Bauze, Deni Harbianto, Soewarta Kosen, Aleli Kraft, Faozi Kurniawan, Michelle D. Macalintal, Paul A. Mariano, Kim Nguyen, Marian Angelika K. Panganiban, Rajashree Panicker, Johanna M. Santiago, Sneha Singh, Jacobe J. Villareal, Yulia Widiati |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
Nepal | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
Lecturer | 23 | 17% |
Researcher | 15 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 36 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,398,866
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,949
of 5,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,094
of 184,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#28
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.