↓ Skip to main content

Towards geometric D6-brane model building on non-factorisable toroidal ℤ4-orbifolds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions
Title
Towards geometric D6-brane model building on non-factorisable toroidal ℤ4-orbifolds
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/jhep08(2016)062
Authors

Mikel Berasaluce-González, Gabriele Honecker, Alexander Seifert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#14,293
of 24,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,327
of 376,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#376
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.