↓ Skip to main content

Multiple sclerosis and primary vascular dysregulation (Flammer syndrome)

Overview of attention for article published in EPMA Journal, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Multiple sclerosis and primary vascular dysregulation (Flammer syndrome)
Published in
EPMA Journal, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13167-016-0062-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Konieczka, Simone Koch, Tatjana Binggeli, Andreas Schoetzau, Juerg Kesselring

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS of still unknown aetiology. Flammer syndrome (FS) encompasses a set of symptoms and signs that are primarily but not solely related to the dysregulation of blood vessels. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether FS symptoms occur more often in MS patients than in controls. Fifty-eight MS patients and 259 controls answered a questionnaire covering 15 symptoms and signs of FS. Six of the 15 symptoms and signs of FS (dizziness, low body mass index, cold hands and/or feet, tendency toward perfectionism, reduced thirst, feeling cold) were found significantly more often in MS patients than in controls. Seven additional symptoms and signs (tinnitus, headaches, increased pain sensation, long sleep-onset time, migraines, increased response to certain drugs, low blood pressure) also occurred more often in MS patients, but the difference in frequency was not statistically significant. One sign (reversible skin blotches) was found less often in MS patients, but the difference in frequency was not statistically significant. One symptom (increased smell perception) was found significantly less often in MS patients. MS patients suffer significantly more often from FS symptoms and signs than controls. The reason for this association between MS and FS and the potential implications of this association still need to be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 11 31%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 50%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Psychology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,738,195
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from EPMA Journal
#130
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,759
of 357,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPMA Journal
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.