You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Proteomics
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1872-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1871-3, 978-1-4939-1872-0
|
| Authors |
Stalmach A, Husi H, Mosbahi K, Albalat A, Mullen W, Mischak H, Latosinska A, Frantzi M, Vlahou A, Makridakis M |
| Editors |
Antonia Vlahou, Manousos Makridakis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,789,851
of 25,050,563 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#515
of 14,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,208
of 364,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#34
of 995 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,050,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 995 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.