↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the relationship between pharmacists’ job satisfaction and over-the-counter counselling at community pharmacies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the relationship between pharmacists’ job satisfaction and over-the-counter counselling at community pharmacies
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11096-015-0232-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gvidas Urbonas, Loreta Kubilienė

Abstract

Background Community pharmacies have an increasing role in self-medication and community health is dependent on the quality of counselling services provided to patients. Some studies show that pharmacists' job satisfaction affects their work quality; other studies found that higher involvement in clinical services increases pharmacists' job satisfaction. Objective To test the relationship between job satisfaction and over-the-counter counselling practice at community pharmacies. Setting Community pharmacies in Lithuania. Method A convenience sample (n = 305) of community pharmacists participated in the cross-sectional survey where they expressed satisfaction with job and reported on their over-the-counter counselling behaviour on self-report scales. The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling approach was employed for data analysis. Main outcome measure The strength of the relationship between job satisfaction and over-the-counter counselling service. Results A bidirectional relationship between job satisfaction and over-the-counter counselling service was found. In addition, job satisfaction and over-the-counter counselling quality depended on pharmacists' age. Conclusion Organizations were recommended to create a counselling friendly environment that would increase pharmacists' job satisfaction and, in return, counselling quality. Also, additional motivation of the retired pharmacists, as well as development of counselling skills of the younger pharmacy workforce, were seen as a means to improve both organizational climate and counselling quality over the counter.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,333,181
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1,023
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,239
of 389,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.