↓ Skip to main content

Responding to Anxiety with Rumination and Hopelessness: Mechanism of Anxiety-Depression Symptom Co-Occurrence?

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Responding to Anxiety with Rumination and Hopelessness: Mechanism of Anxiety-Depression Symptom Co-Occurrence?
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10608-011-9363-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa R. Starr, Joanne Davila

Abstract

The current research proposes that certain anxiety response styles (specifically, responding to anxiety symptoms with rumination or hopeless cognitions) may increase risk of depressive symptoms, contributing to anxiety-depression comorbidity. We delineate preliminary evidence for this model in three studies. In Study 1, controlling for anxiety response styles significantly reduced the association between anxiety and depressive symptoms in an undergraduate sample. In Study 2, these findings were replicated controlling for conceptually related variables, and anxiety interacted with anxiety response styles to predict greater depressive symptoms. In Study 3, anxiety response styles moderated the prospective association between anxiety and later depression in a generalized anxiety disorder sample. Results support a role for anxiety response styles in anxiety-depression co-occurrence, and show that hopeless/ruminative anxiety response styles can be measured with high reliability and convergent and divergent validity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 54%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,631,278
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#642
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,702
of 112,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.