| Title |
Review of ground-based methods to measure the distribution of biomass in forest canopies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-011-0040-z |
| Authors |
Dominik Seidel, Stefan Fleck, Christoph Leuschner, Tom Hammett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 24% |
| Researcher | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 62 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2012.
All research outputs
#21,059,047
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#914
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,311
of 128,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.