↓ Skip to main content

Deaths reported from the accidental intrathecal administration of bortezomib

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deaths reported from the accidental intrathecal administration of bortezomib
Published in
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, July 2012
DOI 10.1177/1078155212453752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Gilbar, Andrew C Seger

Abstract

Medication errors due to the inadvertent intrathecal administration of vincristine and other antineoplastic agents continue to occur despite the development of preventative strategies. Three fatalities due to bortezomib being accidentally given intrathecally instead of by the intended intravenous route have recently been reported by the European Medicines Agency. The most effective method for preventing accidental intrathecal administration is to eliminate the syringe as a means of administrating neurotoxic agents and prepare them in a small volume minibag. However due to a lack of stability data for bortezomib in a minibag and the increasing use of bortezomib via the subcutaneous route necessitates the continued preparation of bortezomib in a syringe. A number of recommendations aimed at preventing the possibility of accidental intrathecal administration of bortezomib are made. These need to be incorporated into standard practice internationally and pharmacists must take the lead to ensure this occurs as a matter of urgency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,651,716
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
#1,036
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,395
of 169,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.