You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gillian Murphy, Elizabeth Loftus, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Linda J. Levine, Ciara M. Greene |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,080,557
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from Memory
#155
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,914
of 405,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.